Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00300
Original file (BC 2014 00300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00300

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The effective date of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) transfer be changed to 1 Feb 12. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He applied to transfer his TEB benefits in Feb 12 and his application was rejected, but he was never notified of the rejection.  When he discovered the error in Dec 13, he applied again, but the four year active duty service commitment he accepted for TEB should start 1 Feb 12 rather than in Dec 13. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 31 Jul 14, the applicant voluntarily retired under Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA), and was credited with 17 years, 09 months, and 15 days of active service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The member states he never received the email communications from the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) instructing him to complete the TEB Statement of Understanding (SOU) or the notification his application was rejected.  However, he did not provide sufficient justification or documentation.  To access the MilConnect website and submit a TEB request, members must go through Virtual MPF (vMPF).  Prior to accessing Self-Service Actions, the member must click the button saying:  “I have verified my email and phone.”  This function allows the member to provide both a military and personal email address.  Had the member accurately completed this step, he would have received two emails from the TFSC.  The first would have been the initial notification providing instructions on the actions required.  The second would have been the rejection of the TEB request.  Additionally, when the member applies through MilConnect there is a “Message from your Service Component” which states:  “Your transfer request is not final until you digitally sign the AF Form 4406 (Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Statement of Understanding) email with ‘TEB incident’ in the subject line, stating your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature.  If you DO NOT receive this email, call the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) at 1-800-525-0102 ASAP!”  There is no record of the member inquiring about the status of the application until an e-mail was sent to the AFPC/DPSIT Education Services advising that the previous submission had expired and the member would need to reapply.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIT and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Even if there were a basis to correct the applicant’s records to reflect he elected to transfer his benefits on 1 Feb 12, in view of the fact the applicant voluntarily retired on 31 Jul 14, he would not have met the requisite service commitment for the transfer.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00300 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 14, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 31 Jan 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03211

    Original file (BC 2014 03211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits the 17 Jul 13 e-mail from the TFSC stating that his application was rejected; a print-out from the milConnect website showing that he applied for his benefits in Aug 11 and inputted a request to transfer months of his benefits to his dependents; an AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Air Force, which validates that he extended in order to qualify for TEB transfer; and an unsigned SOU. While the applicant did complete an extension for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03431

    Original file (BC 2013 03431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once he was notified, he immediately requested and filed for the date of his service commitment to be adjusted to the original request date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. Prior to accessing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02830

    Original file (BC 2013 02830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 17 Jan 12, she applied to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents; however, on 30 Jan 12, her application was rejected because she did not complete and return the Statement of Understanding (SOU). In addition, when the applicant applied through MilConnect there was a “Message from your Service Component” displayed, which states “Your transfer request is not final until you...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03407

    Original file (BC 2014 03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03407 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be approved. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02724

    Original file (BC 2013 02724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 10 Feb 2011, he applied and received approval for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). * For those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 Aug 2009, and before 1 Jul 2010, no additional service is required. Additionally, when the applicant applied through MilConnect, there would have been a message from his service component stating that his TEB is not final until AF Form 4406,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04869

    Original file (BC 2013 04869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In many cases, the AFPC advisory opinions for those cases use words that match the verbiage in the AFPC advisory opinion on his case. He visited the Air Force Education Center in person to complete the transfer application. He believes the procedures regarding how members transfer benefits have changed from the date he executed his transfer in November 2010.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233

    Original file (BC 2013 05233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05876

    Original file (BC 2013 05876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s first TEB application clearly stated the service member must use the vMPF to complete the TEB SOU. It also stated if the service member did not meet the retainability requirements and failed to sign the TEB SOU within 14 days, the application would be rejected. He was provided a TEB extension until 16 Nov 11; however, he failed to sign the TEB SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03716

    Original file (BC 2014 03716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant states he did not receive email communication from the TFSC, the message presented to the applicant during the TEB application process states that completion of the TEB SOU was a mandatory requirement for TEB approval. Additionally, the applicant was provided an opportunity to validate his email address on record to ensure he would receive TEB communication from the TFSC during the application process. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...